Economy > Poverty > Share of all poor people: Countries Compared
- Home
- Country Info
- Stats
- Economy
- Poverty
- Share of all poor people
Author: Suchita Vemuri, Staff Editor
The distribution of the poor over different countries is indicative of nothing more than their spread geographically. China and India, the <a href=/graph/peo_pop>world’s most populous nations</a>, are home to over 63% of the world’s poorest and while they rank low on <a href=/graph/eco_gdp_cap>GDP per capita</a>, are high on GDP ranking in terms of <a href=/graph/eco_gdp_ppp>purchasing power parity</a>, China 2nd behind the USA and India 4th.
It is also interesting to compare the global distribution of the poor with the proportion of <a href=/graph/eco_pop_bel_pov_lin&int=-1>people living below the poverty line</a> within each country and the ratios of a country’s poor with the distribution of wealth within each country. In India, for example, <a href=/graph/eco_inc_dis_ric_10&int=-1>the richest tenth</a> consume 33.5% of the resources, in China (and the USA) around 30.5%).
It is also interesting to compare the global distribution of the poor with the proportion of <a href=/graph/eco_pop_bel_pov_lin&int=-1>people living below the poverty line</a> within each country and the ratios of a country’s poor with the distribution of wealth within each country. In India, for example, <a href=/graph/eco_inc_dis_ric_10&int=-1>the richest tenth</a> consume 33.5% of the resources, in China (and the USA) around 30.5%).
DEFINITION:
The percentage of the world's total poor who live in each nation. 'Poor' here is defined as lving below the global poverty line of US$1 per day.
CONTENTS
# | COUNTRY | AMOUNT | DATE | GRAPH |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | India | 41.01% | 2003 | |
2 | China | 22.12% | 2003 | |
3 | Nigeria | 8.03% | 2003 | |
4 | Pakistan | 3.86% | 2003 | |
5 | Bangladesh | 3.49% | 2003 | |
Emerging markets average (profile) | 3.43% | 2003 | ||
=6 | Brazil | 1.82% | 2003 | |
=6 | Ethiopia | 1.82% | 2003 | |
8 | Indonesia | 1.49% | 2003 | |
9 | Mexico | 1.43% | 2003 | |
10 | Russia | 0.99% | 2003 | |
=11 | Nepal | 0.78% | 2003 | |
=11 | Ghana | 0.78% | 2003 | |
13 | Colombia | 0.76% | 2003 | |
14 | Kenya | 0.72% | 2003 | |
15 | Mali | 0.71% | 2003 | |
16 | Madagascar | 0.68% | 2003 | |
17 | Burkina Faso | 0.62% | 2003 | |
=18 | Mozambique | 0.61% | 2003 | |
=18 | Tanzania | 0.61% | 2003 | |
20 | Niger | 0.59% | 2003 | |
21 | Zambia | 0.58% | 2003 | |
22 | Venezuela | 0.51% | 2003 | |
=23 | South Africa | 0.45% | 2003 | |
=23 | Cameroon | 0.45% | 2003 | |
25 | Zimbabwe | 0.41% | 2003 | |
26 | Peru | 0.36% | 2003 | |
27 | Rwanda | 0.27% | 2003 | |
28 | Sierra Leone | 0.26% | 2003 | |
29 | Yemen | 0.25% | 2003 | |
=30 | Ecuador | 0.23% | 2003 | |
=30 | Central African Republic | 0.23% | 2003 | |
32 | Senegal | 0.22% | 2003 | |
33 | Egypt | 0.18% | 2003 | |
=34 | Ukraine | 0.14% | 2003 | |
=34 | Honduras | 0.14% | 2003 | |
=34 | Turkey | 0.14% | 2003 | |
37 | Laos | 0.13% | 2003 | |
=38 | El Salvador | 0.12% | 2003 | |
=38 | Sri Lanka | 0.12% | 2003 | |
Former Soviet republics average (profile) | 0.115% | 2003 | ||
=40 | Thailand | 0.11% | 2003 | |
=40 | Bolivia | 0.11% | 2003 | |
=42 | Paraguay | 0.1% | 2003 | |
=42 | Guatemala | 0.1% | 2003 | |
44 | South Korea | 0.09% | 2003 | |
=45 | Uzbekistan | 0.08% | 2003 | |
=45 | Lesotho | 0.08% | 2003 | |
=47 | Mauritania | 0.07% | 2003 | |
=47 | The Gambia | 0.07% | 2003 | |
=47 | Poland | 0.07% | 2003 | |
=50 | Romania | 0.06% | 2003 | |
=50 | Algeria | 0.06% | 2003 | |
=50 | Namibia | 0.06% | 2003 | |
=53 | Botswana | 0.05% | 2003 | |
=53 | Moldova | 0.05% | 2003 | |
=53 | Morocco | 0.05% | 2003 | |
=56 | Panama | 0.04% | 2003 | |
=56 | Costa Rica | 0.04% | 2003 | |
=56 | Kazakhstan | 0.04% | 2003 | |
=59 | Mongolia | 0.03% | 2003 | |
=59 | Chile | 0.03% | 2003 | |
=59 | Armenia | 0.03% | 2003 | |
=62 | Czech Republic | 0.02% | 2003 | |
=62 | Portugal | 0.02% | 2003 | |
=62 | Belarus | 0.02% | 2003 | |
=62 | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.02% | 2003 | |
=62 | Hungary | 0.02% | 2003 | |
=62 | Tunisia | 0.02% | 2003 | |
=62 | Bulgaria | 0.02% | 2003 | |
=62 | Dominican Republic | 0.02% | 2003 | |
=70 | Jordan | 0.01% | 2003 | |
=70 | Uruguay | 0.01% | 2003 | |
=70 | Georgia | 0.01% | 2003 | |
=70 | Croatia | 0.01% | 2003 | |
=70 | Lithuania | 0.01% | 2003 | |
=70 | Slovakia | 0.01% | 2003 | |
=70 | Jamaica | 0.01% | 2003 | |
=70 | Azerbaijan | 0.01% | 2003 | |
=78 | Estonia | 0.0 | 2003 | |
=78 | Latvia | 0.0 | 2003 | |
=78 | Slovenia | 0.0 | 2003 |
Citation
0
It is also interesting to compare the global distribution of the poor with the proportion of <a href=/graph/eco_pop_bel_pov_lin&int=-1>people living below the poverty line</a> within each country and the ratios of a country’s poor with the distribution of wealth within each country. In India, for example, <a href=/graph/eco_inc_dis_ric_10&int=-1>the richest tenth</a> consume 33.5% of the resources, in China (and the USA) around 30.5%).
Posted on 21 Jan 2005
Suchita Vemuri, Staff Editor
0
Posted on 14 Mar 2011
chihuahua
0
Posted on 21 Aug 2010
Huang Lei
0
Posted on 01 Apr 2010
Liz