×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Chile & Peru

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT
Chile
Peru
HISTORY
Consumption 5.3 billion cu m
Ranked 40th.
5.49 billion cu m
Ranked 39th. 4% more than Chile

Consumption > Per capita 142,213.42 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 30th. 22% more than Peru
116,171.88 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 33th.

Consumption per capita 139.03 cu m
Ranked 31st. 17% more than Peru
118.43 cu m
Ranked 33th.

Imports 3.83 billion cu m
Ranked 26th.
0.0
Ranked 51st.

Imports per capita 41 cu m
Ranked 15th.
0.0
Ranked 57th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households 16,074 Terajoules
Ranked 39th. 5358 times more than Peru
3 Terajoules
Ranked 64th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 2.49 Terajoules
Ranked 48th. 14 times more than Peru
0.182 Terajoules
Ranked 74th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 19.61 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd. 8 times more than Peru
2.45 Terajoules
Ranked 87th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 4 Terajoules
Ranked 54th. 22 times more than Peru
0.182 Terajoules
Ranked 83th.

Including LNG > Total resources per capita 0.234 Terajoules
Ranked 51st.
0.476 Terajoules
Ranked 37th. 2 times more than Chile

Production None None
Proved > Reserves per capita 5,712.28 cu m
Ranked 47th.
11,417.21 cu m
Ranked 36th. Twice as much as Chile

Proved reserves 97.97 billion cu m
Ranked 51st.
359.6 billion cu m
Ranked 35th. 4 times more than Chile

Reserves 67.78 billion cubic feet
Ranked 41st.
245.1 billion cubic feet
Ranked 28th. 4 times more than Chile
Reserves per capita 4,148.67 cubic feet
Ranked 38th.
8,840.94 cubic feet
Ranked 28th. 2 times more than Chile
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 2.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 48th. 14 times more than Peru
0.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 75th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 126,127 Terajoules
Ranked 45th. 3 times more than Peru
44,616 Terajoules
Ranked 67th.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 19.61 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd. 8 times more than Peru
2.45 Terajoules
Ranked 87th.

Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000 5.49 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
7.46 Terajoules
Ranked 46th. 36% more than Chile

Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000 5.03 Terajoules
Ranked 48th. 2 times more than Peru
2.45 Terajoules
Ranked 59th.

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 0.458
Ranked 40th. 16 times more than Peru
0.0292
Ranked 56th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 1.34 Terajoules
Ranked 47th. 12344 times more than Peru
0.000108 Terajoules
Ranked 72nd.

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent 7.4
Ranked 44th. 9 times more than Peru
0.8
Ranked 59th.
Consumption > Date of > Information 2003 est. 2004 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 1.64 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 35th. 2 times more than Peru
0.674 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 47th.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector 26,711 Terajoules
Ranked 37th. 42% more than Peru
18,840 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 50th. 14 times more than Peru
0.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 77th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 21,823 Terajoules
Ranked 41st. 7274 times more than Peru
3 Terajoules
Ranked 75th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 1.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 48th.
0.0
Ranked 74th.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction 42,015 Terajoules
Ranked 48th. 8 times more than Peru
5,042 Terajoules
Ranked 77th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 7.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd. 5 times more than Peru
1.59 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 72nd.

Including LNG > Flared and vented 2,794 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.
138,777 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 50 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 320,428 Terajoules
Ranked 46th. 5 times more than Peru
68,008 Terajoules
Ranked 72nd.

Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita 0.286 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 21st.
1.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage 4,668 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd.
31,551 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 7 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 320,428 Terajoules
Ranked 46th. 5 times more than Peru
68,008 Terajoules
Ranked 72nd.

Including LNG > Gross > Production 89,716 Terajoules
Ranked 53th.
206,785 Terajoules
Ranked 45th. 2 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Net > Production 82,254 Terajoules
Ranked 55th. 21% more than Peru
68,008 Terajoules
Ranked 56th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability 65,285 Terajoules
Ranked 50th. 13 times more than Peru
5,045 Terajoules
Ranked 84th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 4.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 54th. 22 times more than Peru
0.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 85th.

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita 5.78 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 4th.
-17,627,137,066.901 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 34th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 8.22 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd. 5 times more than Peru
1.61 Terajoules
Ranked 77th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000 0.984 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd. 9092 times more than Peru
0.000108 Terajoules
Ranked 62nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000 1.63 Terajoules
Ranked 35th. 2 times more than Peru
0.68 Terajoules
Ranked 47th.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 2.57 Terajoules
Ranked 50th. 14 times more than Peru
0.182 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000 1.63 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 5 times more than Peru
0.319 Terajoules
Ranked 33th.

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants 26,711 Terajoules
Ranked 28th. 3 times more than Peru
8,173 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction 40,646 Terajoules
Ranked 41st. 8 times more than Peru
5,042 Terajoules
Ranked 72nd.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 19.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 53th. 8 times more than Peru
2.43 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 88th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 134,262 Terajoules
Ranked 44th. 3 times more than Peru
44,616 Terajoules
Ranked 71st.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 8.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd. 5 times more than Peru
1.59 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 78th.

Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita 0.171 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 34th.
4.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th. 29 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 19.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 53th. 8 times more than Peru
2.43 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 88th.

Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita 234.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd.
471.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 38th. Twice as much as Chile

Including LNG > Total resources 3.82 million Terajoules
Ranked 53th.
13.19 million Terajoules
Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Chile

Proved > Reserves 97.97 billion cu m
Ranked 51st.
334.1 billion cu m
Ranked 39th. 3 times more than Chile

Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million 0.507
Ranked 40th. 15 times more than Peru
0.0328
Ranked 56th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres 8.2
Ranked 44th. 9 times more than Peru
0.9
Ranked 59th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day 0.8
Ranked 44th. 8 times more than Peru
0.1
Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 7.72 Terajoules
Ranked 49th. 5 times more than Peru
1.61 Terajoules
Ranked 71st.

Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000 0.286 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.
1.23 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita 0.986 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 43th.
0.0
Ranked 63th.

Proved reserves per capita 5,690.32 cu m
Ranked 49th.
12,047.18 cu m
Ranked 37th. 2 times more than Chile

Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000 0.171 Terajoules
Ranked 33th.
5.01 Terajoules
Ranked 12th. 29 times more than Chile

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×