Environment > Carbon efficiency: Countries Compared
- Home
- Country Info
- Stats
- Environment
- Carbon efficiency
Author: Edria Murray, Staff editor
As this statistic indicates the amount of <b>polluting emissions</b> per GDP dollar - a <b>low</b> value is more desirable.
<p>Emissions per GDP dollar is calculated by comparing <a
href=/graph/env_co2_emi&int=-1>total Carbon dioxide emissions</a> to <a
href=/graph/eco_gdp&int=-1>total GDP</a>.
In general, countries which have a high GDP also have a high rate of carbon dioxide
emissions. However a country can gain a high value in this statistic by having high total
carbon dioxide emissions, a low GDP or both.</p>
<p>For example: Burkina Faso has a similar GDP to Trinidad & Tobago. However the total
Carbon dioxide emissions of Trinidad and Tobago are eighteen times as high as those for
Burkina Faso, so Trinidad and Tobago has a very high value for emissions per GDP.</p>
<p>Carbon dioxide emissions in Burkina Faso have remained roughly static since 1998, however
emissions per GDP may appear to be lower than in the past as the GDP of Burkina Faso has
increased significantly over this time period.</p>
<p>Emissions per GDP dollar is calculated by comparing <a
href=/graph/env_co2_emi&int=-1>total Carbon dioxide emissions</a> to <a
href=/graph/eco_gdp&int=-1>total GDP</a>.
In general, countries which have a high GDP also have a high rate of carbon dioxide
emissions. However a country can gain a high value in this statistic by having high total
carbon dioxide emissions, a low GDP or both.</p>
<p>For example: Burkina Faso has a similar GDP to Trinidad & Tobago. However the total
Carbon dioxide emissions of Trinidad and Tobago are eighteen times as high as those for
Burkina Faso, so Trinidad and Tobago has a very high value for emissions per GDP.</p>
<p>Carbon dioxide emissions in Burkina Faso have remained roughly static since 1998, however
emissions per GDP may appear to be lower than in the past as the GDP of Burkina Faso has
increased significantly over this time period.</p>
CONTENTS
Loading...
# | COUNTRY | AMOUNT | DATE | GRAPH |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.29 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
2 | Azerbaijan | 5.94 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
3 | Uzbekistan | 5.75 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
4 | Ukraine | 5.69 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
5 | Turkmenistan | 5.67 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
6 | Mongolia | 5.45 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
7 | United Arab Emirates | 4.92 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
8 | Kazakhstan | 4.78 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
9 | North Korea | 4.72 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
10 | Estonia | 3.89 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
11 | Russia | 3.84 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
12 | Republic of Macedonia | 3.74 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
13 | Saudi Arabia | 3.6 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
Former Soviet republics average (profile) | 3.5 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
14 | Jamaica | 3.29 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
15 | Iraq | 3.23 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
16 | Bulgaria | 3.15 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
17 | Venezuela | 3.04 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
18 | Kuwait | 2.92 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
19 | Moldova | 2.91 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
20 | Poland | 2.84 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
21 | Libya | 2.78 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
OPEC countries average (profile) | 2.75 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
22 | Syria | 2.68 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
23 | South Africa | 2.56 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
24 | Belarus | 2.51 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
25 | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2.5 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
26 | Lebanon | 2.45 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
Middle Eastern and North Africa average (profile) | 2.43 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
27 | Czech Republic | 2.43 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
28 | Iran | 2.36 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=29 | Tajikistan | 2.33 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=29 | Oman | 2.33 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
South and Central Asia average (profile) | 2.24 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
31 | Jordan | 2.16 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
32 | Nigeria | 2.12 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
33 | Australia | 2.07 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
34 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2.04 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
Cold countries average (profile) | 2.04 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
35 | China | 2.03 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
36 | Algeria | 2.02 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
37 | Mauritania | 2 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
Muslim countries average (profile) | 1.96 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
Emerging markets average (profile) | 1.93 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
38 | Malaysia | 1.92 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
39 | Slovakia | 1.89 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
40 | Ecuador | 1.85 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
41 | Romania | 1.81 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
42 | United States | 1.77 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
43 | Bolivia | 1.76 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
Non-religious countries average (profile) | 1.75 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
44 | Canada | 1.69 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
45 | Lithuania | 1.68 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
46 | Croatia | 1.67 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
European Union average (profile) | 1.55 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
47 | Cuba | 1.54 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
NATO countries average (profile) | 1.52 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
=48 | South Korea | 1.51 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=48 | Israel | 1.51 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=48 | Greece | 1.51 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
51 | Thailand | 1.5 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
52 | Kyrgyzstan | 1.49 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
53 | Hungary | 1.47 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
54 | Cote d'Ivoire | 1.46 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=55 | Latvia | 1.45 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=55 | Egypt | 1.45 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
57 | India | 1.39 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
High income OECD countries average (profile) | 1.39 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
Eurozone average (profile) | 1.38 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
=58 | Mexico | 1.33 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=58 | Slovenia | 1.33 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=60 | Dominica | 1.31 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=60 | Turkey | 1.31 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
62 | Finland | 1.28 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
63 | Chile | 1.26 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=64 | Netherlands | 1.23 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=64 | Ireland | 1.23 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
Group of 7 countries (G7) average (profile) | 1.22 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
=66 | New Zealand | 1.19 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=66 | Germany | 1.19 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=68 | United Kingdom | 1.17 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=68 | Tunisia | 1.17 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=70 | Zimbabwe | 1.14 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=70 | Pakistan | 1.14 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=72 | Indonesia | 1.11 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=72 | Armenia | 1.11 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
74 | Belgium | 1.1 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
75 | Bhutan | 1.09 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
Former Spanish colonies average (profile) | 1.09 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
76 | Denmark | 1.08 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
failed states average (profile) | 1.04 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
=77 | Panama | 1.02 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=77 | Botswana | 1.02 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
79 | Gabon | 1.01 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=80 | Spain | 1 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=80 | Japan | 1 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
South Asia average (profile) | 0.995 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
82 | Liberia | 0.99 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
83 | Portugal | 0.97 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
84 | Honduras | 0.93 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=85 | Morocco | 0.91 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=85 | Italy | 0.91 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=85 | Nicaragua | 0.91 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
88 | Austria | 0.9 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
89 | Vietnam | 0.88 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
90 | Guinea-Bissau | 0.86 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
91 | Kenya | 0.85 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
92 | Argentina | 0.82 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
Former French colonies average (profile) | 0.782 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | ||
=93 | France | 0.78 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=93 | Iceland | 0.78 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
95 | Philippines | 0.77 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
96 | Colombia | 0.75 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
97 | Norway | 0.74 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
98 | Senegal | 0.73 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
99 | Brazil | 0.71 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
100 | Sweden | 0.7 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
101 | Guatemala | 0.68 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
102 | Peru | 0.67 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
103 | El Salvador | 0.65 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
104 | Switzerland | 0.61 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=105 | Sierra Leone | 0.6 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=105 | Papua New Guinea | 0.6 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
107 | Zambia | 0.58 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=108 | Paraguay | 0.54 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=108 | Angola | 0.54 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
110 | Uruguay | 0.53 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
111 | Costa Rica | 0.51 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
112 | Albania | 0.44 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
113 | Burma | 0.42 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=114 | Tanzania | 0.39 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=114 | Togo | 0.39 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=114 | Niger | 0.39 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
117 | Sri Lanka | 0.38 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
118 | Benin | 0.37 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=119 | Malawi | 0.36 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=119 | Bangladesh | 0.36 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=119 | Ghana | 0.36 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
122 | The Gambia | 0.34 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
123 | Haiti | 0.31 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=124 | Madagascar | 0.3 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=124 | Nepal | 0.3 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=126 | Burkina Faso | 0.28 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=126 | Mozambique | 0.28 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=128 | Guinea | 0.25 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=128 | Sudan | 0.25 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
130 | Cameroon | 0.22 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
131 | Rwanda | 0.21 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
132 | Mali | 0.18 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
133 | Central African Republic | 0.17 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
134 | Burundi | 0.16 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=135 | Ethiopia | 0.15 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=135 | Uganda | 0.15 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
137 | Laos | 0.14 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
138 | Cambodia | 0.12 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
139 | Chad | 0.05 CO2 emissions/$ GDP | 1998 | |
=140 | Somalia | 0.0 | 1998 | |
=140 | Namibia | 0.0 | 1998 |
Citation
Interesting observations about Environment > Carbon efficiency
- Ukraine ranked first for carbon efficiency amongst Christian countries in 1998.
- Azerbaijan ranked first for carbon efficiency amongst Muslim countries in 1998.
- Trinidad and Tobago ranked first for carbon efficiency amongst Hot countries in 1998.
- Estonia ranked first for carbon efficiency amongst High income OECD countries in 1998.
- United States ranked first for carbon efficiency amongst Group of 7 countries (G7) in 1998.
- South Africa ranked first for carbon efficiency amongst Sub-Saharan Africa in 1998.
- Venezuela ranked first for carbon efficiency amongst Catholic countries in 1998.
- Iraq ranked first for carbon efficiency amongst Failed states in 1998.
- Russia ranked third for carbon efficiency amongst Emerging markets in 1998.
- Syria ranked first for carbon efficiency amongst Former French colonies in 1998.
0
<p>Emissions per GDP dollar is calculated by comparing <a
href=/graph/env_co2_emi&int=-1>total Carbon dioxide emissions</a> to <a
href=/graph/eco_gdp&int=-1>total GDP</a>.
In general, countries which have a high GDP also have a high rate of carbon dioxide
emissions. However a country can gain a high value in this statistic by having high total
carbon dioxide emissions, a low GDP or both.</p>
<p>For example: Burkina Faso has a similar GDP to Trinidad & Tobago. However the total
Carbon dioxide emissions of Trinidad and Tobago are eighteen times as high as those for
Burkina Faso, so Trinidad and Tobago has a very high value for emissions per GDP.</p>
<p>Carbon dioxide emissions in Burkina Faso have remained roughly static since 1998, however
emissions per GDP may appear to be lower than in the past as the GDP of Burkina Faso has
increased significantly over this time period.</p>
Posted on 08 Feb 2005
Edria Murray, Staff editor