Transport > Quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards: Countries Compared
- Home
- Country Info
- Stats
- Transport
- Quality of port infrastructure, WEF
- 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards
DEFINITION:
Quality of port infrastructure, WEF (1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards). The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).
CONTENTS
# | COUNTRY | AMOUNT | DATE | GRAPH | HISTORY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
=1 | Singapore | 6.8 | 2012 | ||
=1 | Netherlands | 6.8 | 2012 | ||
3 | Hong Kong | 6.5 | 2012 | ||
=4 | United Arab Emirates | 6.4 | 2012 | ||
=4 | Panama | 6.4 | 2012 | ||
=6 | Belgium | 6.3 | 2012 | ||
=6 | Finland | 6.3 | 2012 | ||
8 | Iceland | 6.2 | 2012 | ||
=9 | Germany | 6 | 2012 | ||
=9 | Bahrain | 6 | 2012 | ||
11 | Sweden | 5.9 | 2012 | ||
=12 | Spain | 5.8 | 2012 | ||
=12 | United Kingdom | 5.8 | 2012 | ||
=12 | Denmark | 5.8 | 2012 | ||
=15 | Malta | 5.7 | 2012 | ||
=15 | Canada | 5.7 | 2012 | ||
=17 | United States | 5.6 | 2012 | ||
=17 | Estonia | 5.6 | 2012 | ||
=17 | Barbados | 5.6 | 2012 | ||
=20 | New Zealand | 5.5 | 2012 | ||
=20 | Luxembourg | 5.5 | 2012 | ||
=20 | Malaysia | 5.5 | 2012 | ||
=20 | South Korea | 5.5 | 2012 | ||
=24 | Namibia | 5.4 | 2012 | ||
=24 | Oman | 5.4 | 2012 | ||
=24 | Norway | 5.4 | 2012 | ||
=24 | France | 5.4 | 2012 | ||
Group of 7 countries (G7) average (profile) | 5.37 | 2012 | |||
Eurozone average (profile) | 5.32 | 2012 | |||
=28 | Saudi Arabia | 5.3 | 2012 | ||
=28 | Ireland | 5.3 | 2012 | ||
High income OECD countries average (profile) | 5.3 | 2012 | |||
=30 | Switzerland | 5.2 | 2012 | ||
=30 | Puerto Rico | 5.2 | 2012 | ||
=30 | Chile | 5.2 | 2012 | ||
=30 | Japan | 5.2 | 2012 | ||
=30 | Slovenia | 5.2 | 2012 | ||
=30 | Lithuania | 5.2 | 2012 | ||
=30 | Qatar | 5.2 | 2012 | ||
=37 | Jamaica | 5.1 | 2012 | ||
=37 | Australia | 5.1 | 2012 | ||
Non-religious countries average (profile) | 5.1 | 2012 | |||
39 | European Union | 5.03 | 2012 | ||
European Union average (profile) | 5.03 | 2012 | |||
=40 | Seychelles | 5 | 2012 | ||
=40 | Cyprus | 5 | 2012 | ||
=40 | Suriname | 5 | 2012 | ||
=40 | Portugal | 5 | 2012 | ||
NATO countries average (profile) | 4.93 | 2012 | |||
=44 | Sri Lanka | 4.9 | 2012 | ||
=44 | Uruguay | 4.9 | 2012 | ||
=44 | Austria | 4.9 | 2012 | ||
=47 | Latvia | 4.8 | 2012 | ||
=47 | The Gambia | 4.8 | 2012 | ||
=47 | Morocco | 4.8 | 2012 | ||
=47 | Mauritius | 4.8 | 2012 | ||
=51 | South Africa | 4.7 | 2012 | ||
=51 | Dominican Republic | 4.7 | 2012 | ||
Europe average (profile) | 4.65 | 2012 | |||
=53 | Honduras | 4.6 | 2012 | ||
=53 | Cote d'Ivoire | 4.6 | 2012 | ||
=53 | Czech Republic | 4.6 | 2012 | ||
=53 | Thailand | 4.6 | 2012 | ||
=53 | Tunisia | 4.6 | 2011 | ||
=58 | Brunei | 4.5 | 2012 | ||
=58 | Senegal | 4.5 | 2012 | ||
Middle Eastern and North Africa average (profile) | 4.45 | 2012 | |||
=60 | China | 4.4 | 2012 | ||
=60 | Pakistan | 4.4 | 2012 | ||
=60 | Jordan | 4.4 | 2012 | ||
=60 | Zimbabwe | 4.4 | 2012 | ||
=60 | Turkey | 4.4 | 2012 | ||
=65 | Mexico | 4.3 | 2012 | ||
=65 | Georgia | 4.3 | 2012 | ||
=67 | Cambodia | 4.2 | 2012 | ||
=67 | Greece | 4.2 | 2012 | ||
=67 | Republic of Macedonia | 4.2 | 2012 | ||
=67 | Swaziland | 4.2 | 2012 | ||
OPEC countries average (profile) | 4.14 | 2012 | |||
=71 | Zambia | 4.1 | 2012 | ||
=71 | Kuwait | 4.1 | 2012 | ||
=71 | Mali | 4.1 | 2012 | ||
=71 | Lebanon | 4.1 | 2012 | ||
=71 | Liberia | 4.1 | 2012 | ||
Emerging markets average (profile) | 4.04 | 2012 | |||
=76 | Egypt | 4 | 2012 | ||
=76 | Croatia | 4 | 2012 | ||
=76 | Iran | 4 | 2012 | ||
=76 | Ukraine | 4 | 2012 | ||
=76 | Azerbaijan | 4 | 2012 | ||
=76 | India | 4 | 2012 | ||
=76 | Guatemala | 4 | 2012 | ||
=76 | Ghana | 4 | 2012 | ||
=76 | Hungary | 4 | 2012 | ||
=76 | Slovakia | 4 | 2012 | ||
Former Spanish colonies average (profile) | 3.92 | 2012 | |||
=86 | Cape Verde | 3.9 | 2012 | ||
=86 | Israel | 3.9 | 2012 | ||
=86 | Italy | 3.9 | 2012 | ||
=86 | El Salvador | 3.9 | 2012 | ||
=86 | Ecuador | 3.9 | 2012 | ||
=91 | Uganda | 3.8 | 2012 | ||
=91 | Kenya | 3.8 | 2012 | ||
=91 | Trinidad and Tobago | 3.8 | 2012 | ||
Potential Future EU Members average (profile) | 3.79 | 2012 | |||
=94 | Bulgaria | 3.7 | 2012 | ||
=94 | Russia | 3.7 | 2012 | ||
=94 | Benin | 3.7 | 2012 | ||
=94 | Albania | 3.7 | 2012 | ||
=94 | Botswana | 3.7 | 2012 | ||
=94 | Mauritania | 3.7 | 2012 | ||
=94 | Malawi | 3.7 | 2012 | ||
=94 | Cameroon | 3.7 | 2012 | ||
Former Soviet republics average (profile) | 3.68 | 2012 | |||
Eastern Europe average (profile) | 3.63 | 2012 | |||
=102 | Nigeria | 3.6 | 2012 | ||
=102 | Indonesia | 3.6 | 2012 | ||
=102 | Montenegro | 3.6 | 2012 | ||
=102 | Burkina Faso | 3.6 | 2012 | ||
=102 | Argentina | 3.6 | 2012 | ||
=102 | Paraguay | 3.6 | 2012 | ||
=108 | Poland | 3.5 | 2012 | ||
=108 | Peru | 3.5 | 2012 | ||
=108 | Rwanda | 3.5 | 2012 | ||
=108 | Guinea | 3.5 | 2012 | ||
=108 | Libya | 3.5 | 2012 | ||
=108 | Ethiopia | 3.5 | 2012 | ||
=114 | Kazakhstan | 3.4 | 2012 | ||
=114 | Mozambique | 3.4 | 2012 | ||
=114 | Vietnam | 3.4 | 2012 | ||
=114 | Lesotho | 3.4 | 2012 | ||
=114 | Syria | 3.4 | 2011 | ||
=119 | Guyana | 3.3 | 2012 | ||
=119 | Bolivia | 3.3 | 2012 | ||
=119 | Philippines | 3.3 | 2012 | ||
=119 | Sierra Leone | 3.3 | 2012 | ||
=119 | Bangladesh | 3.3 | 2012 | ||
=119 | Tanzania | 3.3 | 2012 | ||
=119 | Belize | 3.3 | 2011 | ||
=126 | Nicaragua | 3.2 | 2012 | ||
=126 | Colombia | 3.2 | 2012 | ||
=126 | Madagascar | 3.2 | 2012 | ||
=129 | Armenia | 3 | 2012 | ||
=129 | Mongolia | 3 | 2012 | ||
=129 | Yemen | 3 | 2012 | ||
=129 | Moldova | 3 | 2012 | ||
133 | Chad | 2.8 | 2012 | ||
=134 | Algeria | 2.7 | 2012 | ||
=134 | Serbia | 2.7 | 2012 | ||
=134 | Nepal | 2.7 | 2012 | ||
=134 | East Timor | 2.7 | 2012 | ||
=138 | Burundi | 2.6 | 2012 | ||
=138 | Brazil | 2.6 | 2012 | ||
=138 | Romania | 2.6 | 2012 | ||
=138 | Gabon | 2.6 | 2012 | ||
142 | Venezuela | 2.5 | 2012 | ||
143 | Costa Rica | 2.4 | 2012 | ||
144 | Angola | 2.3 | 2011 | ||
145 | Haiti | 1.9 | 2012 | ||
=146 | Tajikistan | 1.7 | 2012 | ||
=146 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1.7 | 2012 | ||
148 | Kyrgyzstan | 1.5 | 2012 |
Citation
Interesting observations about Transport > Quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards
- Netherlands ranked first for quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards amongst Europe in 2012.
- Panama ranked first for quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards amongst Christian countries in 2012.
- Singapore ranked first for quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards amongst Hot countries in 2012.
- United Arab Emirates ranked first for quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards amongst Muslim countries in 2012.
- Belgium ranked first for quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards amongst Cold countries in 2012.
- Estonia ranked first for quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards amongst Emerging markets in 2012.
- Germany ranked first for quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards amongst Group of 7 countries (G7) in 2012.
- Spain ranked second for quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards amongst Catholic countries in 2012.
- Finland ranked third for quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards amongst European Union in 2012.
- Israel ranked third last for quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards amongst High income OECD countries in 2012.